FORESHOCK

Every protocol here carries a dated score and the share of it backed by independently verified evidence. Where that share is still thin the assessment says so, is marked Low-signal rather than given a risk band, and holds every unevidenced category at the neutral midpoint instead of assuming it safe. Every score and its reasoning are free to read; the underlying dependency, incident and audit records are part of a plan. How a score is built, how to read one, and how the rubric was tested against real exploits are all in the methodology.

Coverage grows three ways: protocols Foreshock selects at its own discretion, protocols requested through the Request coverage button, and sponsored assessments delivered on an agreed timeline. No path has a guaranteed date except sponsorship.

Scores run from 0, the safest reading, to 100, the riskiest, where 50 is the neutral midpoint every unverified category is held at. Red marks a protocol scoring 50 or above, the band called Elevated: worse than neutral on the evidence gathered. Amber marks one below it, called Moderate. The boundary is fixed. It does not move as coverage grows, and it is not fitted to any backtest result.

Uniswap V2

Uniswap V2 official site N/A

Multi-Chain

:

  • Evidence: this reading is based on 100% of the scored weight, verified against named sources. Categories without verified data are excluded from the reading, never counted as safe.
  • Validation: measured against 1 comparable incident/control in this protocol's TVL, age and category bucket.
Score by categories
Audit profile10.1

1 audit/contest on record, most recent (Unnamed six-engineer team (identity withheld by Uniswap's own docs), 2020-04-30) has unread findings, scored as unknown, not assumed clean.

Code characteristics7.6

Admin key: none, open source.

TVL profile6.6

TVL is 90% below this protocol's own peak and has not recovered, so the revenue that funds audits, bounties and maintenance is largely gone while the contracts still hold value; TVL change (27%) is within a stable range.

Governance attack surface5.1

Top 10 holders control 45.44%, adjusted figure may still include pooled custody (untagged exchanges, infrastructure contracts) due to tagging coverage limits; exclusions require positive identification.

Dependency risk3.0

No bridge or oracle dependencies on record (Uniswap V2 takes no price from outside: each pair prices trades from its own reserves, and the protocol is itself a price-feed PROVIDER - pairs accumulate time-weighted prices that external contracts read as TWAP oracles.).

Historical incidents2.3

No known own or inherited incidents.

Team factors1.8

Doxxed team, track record: unknown.

Protocol age1.5

1416 days live, past the ~1yr floor; treated the same as any older protocol, not scored progressively safer with more age.

Bug bounty1.0

Has a bug bounty program, up to $2 250 000.

Assets held (4)

Available with a plan. See pricing.

Dependencies (1)

Available with a plan. See pricing.

Incident history (0)

Available with a plan. See pricing.

Audit history (1)

Available with a plan. See pricing.

This assessment follows Foreshock's published methodology. Exact category weights, scoring rules, thresholds, and aggregation logic are proprietary and not shown here. How to interpret this assessment