Protocols

Request coverage

Only protocols with enough independently verified data to trust a score appear here. This is a permanent rule, not a temporary gap.

How protocols get listed: a protocol is added once it clears the same sufficiency threshold as everything else here. Which protocol gets curated next is ordered by TVL rank and by demand from coverage requests, so a request can move a protocol up the queue.

SSV Network

confidence low· verified weight 70% · updated 2026-07-26 · methodology 0.7.0

ChainsEthereumSSV Networkofficial site →

Confidence capped at low:

this methodology version hasn't been backtested against any historical incidents in this protocol's bucket yet
not because this protocol's data is thin (70% of category weight is verified data)

Why this rating

The highest-signal researched categories behind this assessment.

Code characteristics

verified

admin key: multisig, 5/9 multisig (requires 5 of 9 keys to act), upgradeable without a meaningful timelock, open source.

Dependency risk

verified

uses 1 oracle (4 oracle addresses, all externally-owned accounts).

TVL profile

verified

TVL change (14%) is within a stable range.

Governance attack surface

verified

top 10 holders control 16.77%, adjusted figure may still include pooled custody (untagged exchanges, infrastructure contracts) due to tagging coverage limits; exclusions require positive identification.

Historical incidents

verified

no known own or inherited incidents.

Risk-reducing factors

Researched findings that lower this protocol's assessed risk.

Historical incidents

no known own or inherited incidents.

Governance attack surface

Protocol age

1134 days live, past the ~1yr floor; treated the same as any older protocol, not scored progressively safer with more age.

TVL profile

TVL change (14%) is within a stable range.

Dependencies

uses 1 oracle (4 oracle addresses, all externally-owned accounts)

Incident history

No material incidents on record.

Audit history

No audit history recorded.

This assessment follows Foreshock's published methodology. Exact category weights, scoring rules, thresholds, and aggregation logic are proprietary and not shown here. How to interpret this assessment

Do you hold a position in this protocol?

Get an email when this assessment materially changes.

Monitor this protocol