FORESHOCK

Protocols

Request coverage

Only protocols with enough independently verified data to trust a score appear here. This is a permanent rule, not a temporary gap.

How protocols get listed: a protocol is added once it clears the same sufficiency threshold as everything else here. Which protocol gets curated next is ordered by TVL rank and by demand from coverage requests, so a request can move a protocol up the queue.

Radiant V2

confidence medium· verified weight 75% · updated 2026-07-26 · methodology 0.7.0

ChainsMulti-ChainEthereumArbitrumBaseBinanceRadiant V2official site →

Confidence medium:

  • limited by backtest coverage
  • only 4 comparable incidents/controls found in this protocol's TVL/age/category bucket
  • 75% of category weight is verified data
Why this rating
The highest-signal researched categories behind this assessment.

Historical incidents

verified

has 2 prior incidents of its own, hard floor applied regardless of current size/age.

Audit profile

verified

1 audit on record, most recent audit is over 2 years old; the most recent audit found 0 High and 0 Medium severity issues. This reflects code quality at the time of that audit only, not a claim that these specific issues are still unresolved today.

Dependency risk

verified

relies on 1 bridge.

Governance attack surface

verified

top 10 holders control 47.69%, adjusted figure may still include pooled custody (untagged exchanges, infrastructure contracts) due to tagging coverage limits; exclusions require positive identification.

TVL profile

verified

TVL change (1%) is within a stable range.

Risk-reducing factors
Researched findings that lower this protocol's assessed risk.

Protocol age

1223 days live, past the ~1yr floor; treated the same as any older protocol, not scored progressively safer with more age.

TVL profile

TVL change (1%) is within a stable range.

Dependencies
  • relies on 1 bridge
Incident history
  • 2024-10-16 - Access Control Exploit ($53M lost)

    Still reflected in this protocol's assessment. Incident history does not expire under the methodology.

  • 2024-01-02 - Flashloan New Market Exploit ($4.5M lost)

    Still reflected in this protocol's assessment. Incident history does not expire under the methodology.

Audit history
  • Zokyo 2024-03-06

    Unresolved issues:

    0 low, 0 medium, 0 high, 0 critical

This assessment follows Foreshock's published methodology. Exact category weights, scoring rules, thresholds, and aggregation logic are proprietary and not shown here. How to interpret this assessment

Do you hold a position in this protocol?

Get an email when this assessment materially changes.

Monitor this protocol